One of the first steps in formulating a Smart City strategy is to know the city's level of maturity in order to determine the next steps to be taken. In this context, Maturity Models for Smart Cities are a fundamental tool. In the following article, Hossam El Shoukry, Alumni of the Master's in Global Smart City Management, sets out the key features of the three main maturity models existing in the Smart Cities domain: The IDC Smart City Maturity Model, The Maturity Model to Measure and Compare Inequality in Brazilian Cities (Br-SCMM) and the Smart City Maturity Model developed by Sustainability Outlook (SO SCMM).
You are a city official or governor. You are requested to develop a strategy to transform your city/governorate into a smart city, to address the storm of economic, environmental, or demographic challenges that cities are facing nowadays. You are bombarded by several calls from tech companies to try to convince you to buy their smart cities solutions. However, since you are new to the topic, you are quite suspicious that you will take the right decisions in terms of priorities and what exactly are the areas you need to start addressing in this transformation journey. Citizens' high expectations and the need for sustained tourism and business development are bringing pressure to bear on you as a leader to consider the opportunities afforded by emerging technologies. Yet navigating transformative change, as is required by Smart Cities, is a long-term and complex process.
In order to start navigating efficiently in the transformation journey of cities, provincial officials need to be able to assess the current situation of their cities and determine the critical capabilities needed to enable a Smart City Concept.
Different tools are utilized to facilitate this process of the strategic planning of smart cities. An example of which is the Maturity Model (MM) that is generally used for process improvement. Maturity models support the evolution from an initial state, towards an anticipated or desired state, following an outlined path, often based on the best practices from the concerned domain.
Smart Cities Maturity Models
The Software Engineering Institute (SEI) developed the first maturity model that was applied to the software industry, i.e., the Capability and Maturity Model (CMM). The CMM assists in capability assessment, where individual process areas (PA) can be improved towards an objective, without having to address the different areas considered in a maturity level. Moreover, it can be considered a collection of best practices in the software engineering industry. The CMM was developed as a framework to support the process of improvement of an organization from the standpoint of their quality and effectiveness. From then onwards, several maturity models have been developed in different domains, including the smart city domain. Maturity models for smart cities have been defined to help city leaders assess the city’s current state and provide guidance towards its evolution.
Using previous research done by Torrinha & Machado in 2017, the only models related to smart cities considered were maturity models which approached a city in a holistic way.
Therefore, among the different existing maturity models in the domain of smart cities, only three models were selected:
- The IDC Smart City Maturity Model.
- The Maturity Model to Measure and Compare Inequality in Brazilian Cities (Br-SCMM).
- Smart City Maturity Model developed by Sustainability Outlook (SO SCMM).
It is worth mentioning that when you further research the topic, you will also find references for the European Union maturity model, which was used in 2014 for mapping smart cities across the EU to help boost their initiatives. Moreover, PAS 181 from the British standards institute establishes a good practice framework to develop and deliver smart city strategies. However, it does not have a specific assessment model.
Key Features
The above-mentioned maturity models share the same goals of enabling assessment of as – is states of smart cities, identification of gaps, and comparison between cities. The criteria of assessment may be different between each model. For example: IDC maturity model could be better used in assessing the level of governance established to promote the transformation into a smart city concept, which in a way measures the coordination and integration across departments and agencies or for the city system as a whole in addition to assessing a single department.
The (Br-SCMM) has relied on identifying 10 domains called “domains basic” where each domain has its respective Basic Indicator. “The main objective of these domains and basic indicators is to understand the functional areas where there are structural weaknesses that need further attention to the city to be comparable to a smart city. The model was created to measure and compare the cities of Brazil, yet it could be used in other countries with similar cases.
Domains |
Basic Indicator |
Water |
Piped Water |
Education |
HDI-Education |
Energy |
Access to Energy |
Governance |
HDI/Employment |
Housing |
Private Residence |
Environment |
Garbage Collected |
Health |
HDI – Health |
Security |
Homicides/1000 |
Technology |
Computers/Home |
Transport |
Mass transport |
Table (1) Domains & Basic Indicators for (Br-SCMM)
The “SO SCMM” was developed to establish the metrics to be applied to a future Smart City for gauging preparedness against key resource related areas proposed by the union government of India (Transport, spatial planning, water supply, sewerage & sanitation… etc). The model measures preparedness of each area through four different phases; access, efficiency, behavior, and systems focus which is the highest level of maturity.
Conclusion
So bottom line, as a starting point for formulation of your smart city strategy, you will need to have conducted an assessment of where you are now and what are you aspiring to achieve in terms of the different domains of smart city concept. The Smart Cities maturity models are useful tools to help city leaders to develop their strategic plans based on assessment of needs. Understanding how the entire maturity model works is a key element to determine which model could be used for a certain city and to ensure using it efficiently and successfully.
References
Torrinha, Pedro & Machado, Ricardo. (2017). Assessment of maturity models for smart cities supported by maturity model design principles. 252-256. 10.1109/ICSGSC.2017.8038586.
Torrinha, Pedro & Machado, Ricardo. (2017). Assessment of maturity models for smart cities supported by maturity model design principles. 252-256. 10.1109/ICSGSC.2017.8038586.
Clarke, R.Y.: Business Strategy: IDC Government Insights ’ Smart City Maturity Model — Assessment and Action on the Path to Maturity, (2013).
Afonso, R.A., dos Santos Brito, K., do Nascimento, C.H., Garcia, V.C., Álvaro, A.: Brazilian Smart Cities: Using a Maturity Model to Measure and Compare Inequality in Cities, (2015).
Sustainable Business Leadership Forum: Shaping New Age Urban Systems Energy, Connectivity & Climate Resilience, (2014).
Author: Hossam El Shoukry, Country Head of Real Estate at Siemens Egypt and Alumni of the Master's in Global Smart City Management